How would you feel if Ron Paul were elected president?
Answers: I'd look outside to see if the invasion fleet had landed yet.
Way better than Hillary
i'll take him if it's him up against a dem, but that's the only way. i'll take fred thompson as the repub at the moment over any candidate.
We'll see how it goes...I think he'd be ok.
It would be looked at as one of the best days in American history. The day We the People said no more trampling of the Constitution, no more Imperial Wars, no more destruction of our hard earned money through inflation and excessive taxation.
Personally, I would party like there is no tomorrow.
Id feel great. Id start having kids with my wife. Other than that, America would have it made and be in great shape!
Allot of people would have a completely renewed faith in politics. First real change in a long time that would bring the Constitution to the forefront to help clean up and straighten out politics and requests to politicians & government.
It would make me feel like dancin dancin dance the night away
I'd check to make sure I wasn't in the twilight zone.
I would feel like there is a different president in office.
Great. He truly is a good candidate for the job. I disagree w/ somethings, but overall, I think he would do the country some good!
It would be the start of something grand. Of this i'm quite sure.
(Fedup: Damn good answer sweetheart. If he doesn't see it, he doesn't see it. Oh well. ;)).
Just remember............ Oak Trees.
I'd be glad that he won, but I'd also realize that he needs to get a favorable Congress and that the Libertarian Revolution must be completed (which may take 50 years, but things would start to get better immediately and if we're going to have a 50 year struggle, why not make it one to restore freedom in America instead of one to terrorize foreigners?).
Assuming that the cadre of Ron Paul supporters do not get serious about running candidates for Congress (and I have seen nothing indicating that this necessity has struck them yet), after I got over my complete and total shock, intellectual curiousity would set in.
We have never elected a President who had zero supporters in Congress. As such, I would be wondering how could such a president govern. How would Congress respond to a President likely to veto every piece of legislation that they pass? Would bi-partisanship break out with the two parties negotiating their differences to get veto-proof majorities or would everything come to a halt? Would this lead to a major realignment of the two parties? Would this lead to a variation on parliamentary government like we had in the late 1800s when Congress was the most powerful branch of government?
Its been over 50 years (if not longer) since a President has based vetoes on the Constitution and not policy whims (most early presidents assumed that their authority to veto was limited to constitutional questions). How would Congress react to this change?
What would happen if the President refused to faithfully execute laws or programs that he felt were unwise or unconstitutional (e.g. EPA, Department of Education)? Would Congress consider that to be sufficient cause for impeachment (Andrew Johnson was impeached for firing the Secretary of War)?
my waning faith in humanity would be completely restored!
Tmess2...The thing is that there ARE Americans running who support Ron Paul. This isn't a one man show any longer.
To answer the question, I would be very happy and feel that the US intelligence has returned.
I would be pleasantly surprised. He has a long way to go and a lot must happen before the primaries are over, however when he raised $ 4 million on November 5th, the possibility
suddenly became real. Watch for December 16th, the
anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. I predict he will raise
$ 10 million that day and blow all the political prognosticators
minds. With a $20 million 4th quarter, he will become a top
tier candidate, despite the media's best attempts to stop him.
It would be a miracle, getting past the FeResve, the warmongers and ballot fixers.
But he's the only one I like.
I'm betting I'd feel great, since I would have morphed into an alternate universe where such a thing would actually be possible. I always liked traveling.
I will feel better to have in the white house, then Hillary, or Rudy.
Ron Paul gets my vote. Tell everyone you know to vote for him. He will save this country. 2nd choice would be Kucinich.
A very great and pleasant feeling. May he win, Amen!
What does it matter who gets the votes? Look at recent history, its full of empty promises from those running for elected offices. Why would Ron Paul, Hillary Clinton, or any of the rest of them jokers be any different? Abortion has been a hot topic since I can remember presidential campaigns. Nothing has been done, its STILL AN ISSUE!!!!!! Gun control, (use both hands) STILL AN ISSUE!!!! Taxes, you got it, I promise to lower taxes Every 4 years we hear this same rhetoric. The only difference this year is Iraq. We will stay the course We will pull out More politicians trying to get into office with a bunch of blah blah blah, I don't care, CRAP!! So take a look at whatever issue that's most important to you, then look at how many presidents have vowed to change it and never did. My vote probably will go to Hillary. At least that way there will be no suprises when we get screwed!!!!
NAUSEATED!
Sick. But, we don't have to worry the country will not vote for him even if he becomes the Republican nominee.
That most people who voted for him had no clue what he wants. Government isn't a bad thing and the framers of our constitution left it open to interpretation for a reason, times change.
It would bad.
Way better than Hillary
i'll take him if it's him up against a dem, but that's the only way. i'll take fred thompson as the repub at the moment over any candidate.
We'll see how it goes...I think he'd be ok.
It would be looked at as one of the best days in American history. The day We the People said no more trampling of the Constitution, no more Imperial Wars, no more destruction of our hard earned money through inflation and excessive taxation.
Personally, I would party like there is no tomorrow.
Id feel great. Id start having kids with my wife. Other than that, America would have it made and be in great shape!
Allot of people would have a completely renewed faith in politics. First real change in a long time that would bring the Constitution to the forefront to help clean up and straighten out politics and requests to politicians & government.
It would make me feel like dancin dancin dance the night away
I'd check to make sure I wasn't in the twilight zone.
I would feel like there is a different president in office.
Great. He truly is a good candidate for the job. I disagree w/ somethings, but overall, I think he would do the country some good!
It would be the start of something grand. Of this i'm quite sure.
(Fedup: Damn good answer sweetheart. If he doesn't see it, he doesn't see it. Oh well. ;)).
Just remember............ Oak Trees.
I'd be glad that he won, but I'd also realize that he needs to get a favorable Congress and that the Libertarian Revolution must be completed (which may take 50 years, but things would start to get better immediately and if we're going to have a 50 year struggle, why not make it one to restore freedom in America instead of one to terrorize foreigners?).
Assuming that the cadre of Ron Paul supporters do not get serious about running candidates for Congress (and I have seen nothing indicating that this necessity has struck them yet), after I got over my complete and total shock, intellectual curiousity would set in.
We have never elected a President who had zero supporters in Congress. As such, I would be wondering how could such a president govern. How would Congress respond to a President likely to veto every piece of legislation that they pass? Would bi-partisanship break out with the two parties negotiating their differences to get veto-proof majorities or would everything come to a halt? Would this lead to a major realignment of the two parties? Would this lead to a variation on parliamentary government like we had in the late 1800s when Congress was the most powerful branch of government?
Its been over 50 years (if not longer) since a President has based vetoes on the Constitution and not policy whims (most early presidents assumed that their authority to veto was limited to constitutional questions). How would Congress react to this change?
What would happen if the President refused to faithfully execute laws or programs that he felt were unwise or unconstitutional (e.g. EPA, Department of Education)? Would Congress consider that to be sufficient cause for impeachment (Andrew Johnson was impeached for firing the Secretary of War)?
my waning faith in humanity would be completely restored!
Tmess2...The thing is that there ARE Americans running who support Ron Paul. This isn't a one man show any longer.
To answer the question, I would be very happy and feel that the US intelligence has returned.
I would be pleasantly surprised. He has a long way to go and a lot must happen before the primaries are over, however when he raised $ 4 million on November 5th, the possibility
suddenly became real. Watch for December 16th, the
anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. I predict he will raise
$ 10 million that day and blow all the political prognosticators
minds. With a $20 million 4th quarter, he will become a top
tier candidate, despite the media's best attempts to stop him.
It would be a miracle, getting past the FeResve, the warmongers and ballot fixers.
But he's the only one I like.
I'm betting I'd feel great, since I would have morphed into an alternate universe where such a thing would actually be possible. I always liked traveling.
I will feel better to have in the white house, then Hillary, or Rudy.
Ron Paul gets my vote. Tell everyone you know to vote for him. He will save this country. 2nd choice would be Kucinich.
A very great and pleasant feeling. May he win, Amen!
What does it matter who gets the votes? Look at recent history, its full of empty promises from those running for elected offices. Why would Ron Paul, Hillary Clinton, or any of the rest of them jokers be any different? Abortion has been a hot topic since I can remember presidential campaigns. Nothing has been done, its STILL AN ISSUE!!!!!! Gun control, (use both hands) STILL AN ISSUE!!!! Taxes, you got it, I promise to lower taxes Every 4 years we hear this same rhetoric. The only difference this year is Iraq. We will stay the course We will pull out More politicians trying to get into office with a bunch of blah blah blah, I don't care, CRAP!! So take a look at whatever issue that's most important to you, then look at how many presidents have vowed to change it and never did. My vote probably will go to Hillary. At least that way there will be no suprises when we get screwed!!!!
NAUSEATED!
Sick. But, we don't have to worry the country will not vote for him even if he becomes the Republican nominee.
That most people who voted for him had no clue what he wants. Government isn't a bad thing and the framers of our constitution left it open to interpretation for a reason, times change.
It would bad.
More questions & answers:
- When will the Republicans get their 'facts' straight?
- Is the Nov 6th 2007 elections good news for Democrats?
- Is this how Democrats reduce the influence of special interest groups? A fund raising goal of $154 million?
- There's only two weeks to go for the Federal Election.?
- Who other than me thinks that it is outrageous that none of the presidential frontrunners support gay rights?
- Why are you independent/unaffiliated with a party? (voting)?
- Will people vote for Obama just because.....?
- Free voting in house of commons? Pros and Cons?
- Aren't you sick of the status quo of the past 5 Presidents?
- Looks like Judge Judy is for Rudy (Larry King), will this seal the deal?
- Who in thier right mind would vote for Mayor Bloomberg?
- Why is everyone making a mountain out of a mole hill on this Hillary knowing who to pick to ask?
Latest tallies have the Mess in the Middle East costing us nearly 2 TRILLION DOLLARS...2 trillion.
It's so obscene that we are borrowing money from China to fund this war.
Lets bring our
It's so obscene that we are borrowing money from China to fund this war.
Lets bring our
I notice that all the GOP victories including the governorship in Miss and most of the rest of the statewide offices and victories in other states werent mentioned. VA was a close campaign- not a mass
You've correctly pointed out that the emperor has no clothes. I would like to point out that the Repugnicans have none either.
That is why I'm most likely going to vote for Dr. Ron Paul. H
That is why I'm most likely going to vote for Dr. Ron Paul. H
I have way more than two weeks to make up my mind and haven't made it up yet.
To be fair, that is why they are frontrunners. I personally agree that gay people should be allowed to marry and serve in the military and so on, but I am in the minority.
Approximately 85% o
Approximately 85% o
I want to vote for the person I feel best represents my views without having to have the stigma of a party affiliation attached..
yes dey will
dis years election 4 president is very controversial
one one side dere is a white woman runnin nd the other a black man
it will b interesting 2 c the results
dis years election 4 president is very controversial
one one side dere is a white woman runnin nd the other a black man
it will b interesting 2 c the results
Last Time I checked, this was America! (And just walk away. By the time they realize what you said, your gone.)
Yes! No true Patriot would ever make it! Ron Paul would be a start, but only that! A small step in a bigger process of taking back our government. Unless Ron had some support in one of the other branc
All due respects to Judge Judy, who is one smart cookie, I don't care for Rudy. But then they are both from New York, and I'm not. Neither did Oprah's nod to Obama impress me to vote for him. I am SIC
Nobody in their right mind would, but the anti-gun and pro-amnesty people would.
It not only shows a lack of integrity, in so far as she was trying to fool the American people, but it also shows a fear of not controlling the debate. It makes her appear as though she is avoiding th
The Politics & Government informations are posted by the website users and for your use only, and without responsibility on endihm.com.