Next American president: Wich one is the best, for a good relation with Europe?
Answers: Truthfully, Hillary Clinton because Bill had excellent relations with Europe and that would carry over in her administration if she should be elected President. Europeans haven't backed George Bush at all.
Huckabee. He has experience in foreign relations and is a good listener. He has shown himself to be a person who is able to successfully work with people of other beliefs.
Ron Paul.
Obviously John McCain, he is more qualified than all Republican Candidates Combined.
Excluding Bill Richardson, John McCain is more qualified than All of the Democratic candidates combined.
Put next to Bill Richardson John McCain would still be more qualified to run this country. Not to mention he would steal many Democratic voters with his common sense approach.
Ron Paul, he is strongly in favor of not interfering in other countries affairs, and that is desperately needed now. Lets get back to a country that our constitution was supposed to be.
Ron Paul.
Commerce and friendship with all nations,
BINDING ALLIANCES WITH NONE!!!!!!
The one who can mend the fence trampled on by our current prez, so best for the job would be Hilliary
Any Democrat,or independent!The Democrats or indedpendents are more willing to talk and negotiate than just start dropping bombs on the wrong country.Plus this country will fold if a Republican is elected for four more years!
Take a look at what has happened during Bush's Republican Presidency. France was strongly Anti-American and now they have elected a strong Pro-American President. Australia has become far more vocal as being Pro-American and this increase in American support was a major election issue that the Prime Minister ran on and contributed to his win. Canada was slighly Anti-American and have elected a strong Pro-American Prime Minister. Afganistan and Iraq were providing and training Terrorists to attack America and are now Pro-American governments. In Afganistan and Iraq the minority that was Anti-American were obviously removed by force though the people were strongly Pro-American and now their governments properly address the Pro-American stance of the people. Pakistan is a very diffilcult situation though parts of Pakistan were strongly Anti-American and some of these areas remain so though the number is far fewer than it was. The government proper allowed Anti-American Terrorist activities and has now used their military to eliminate these elements. The government has become Pro-American and been a tremendous aid to the US. All of the Eastern European countries and former communist countries have become even stronger Pro-American during the Republican Bush Presidency. It's clear that a strong Republican President is best for the US as well as the world. To me it matters a great deal which Republican becomes President though that is insignificant on every level when you compare the difference between the disaster a Democrat President would be in comparison to having a Republican President continue to strengthen America on the world stage. I know the liberals keep pushing the lie that we've lost our credibility in the world and Europe hates us. I don't know what could be shown as a greater fact than the actual elections that show the vast majority of the people in these countries have become increasingly Pro-American during Republican President Bush's term. If you want to read the London Times back when President Clinton was in office it's hilarious what a baffoon they thought that guy was. The US main stream media wouldn't report the vast majority of his scandals though they were so obvious and he was so obviously guilty that even the Liberal London Times printed the facts thinking for sure Clinton would be removed from office well before the was impeached. The world thought he was an idiot playboy. A nice guy that was fun to party with though just a stupid bubba and certainly not a world leader. I don't know why people are trying to claim now that we were respected at that time when the opposite was the truth.
FYI: Clinton didn't goto the House and Senate asking for approval for the Bosnian war. Clinton didn't go to the the UN for approval for the Bosnian war. I thought these were things the liberals wanted?
I think Ron Paul would probably be the best choice. The European left would probably hate his domestic policies (Europe is plagued by socialists who are obstructing needed economic reforms), but they'd definitely be glad that he would get American troops out of Europe and shut down the American Empire.
The European right and center would probably like Ron Paul's domestic policies and would probably eventually like his foreign policy anyways, as they'd be glad that the European left could no longer attack them based on their support for America (which is the only thing the left in Europe has left).
If we elect Ron Paul, he would seek peace and trade with all nations and entangling alliances with none. This policy is the best way to ensure good relationships with all foreign powers and peace on Earth.
i do agree with patrick
Rudy.
Huckabee. He has experience in foreign relations and is a good listener. He has shown himself to be a person who is able to successfully work with people of other beliefs.
Ron Paul.
Obviously John McCain, he is more qualified than all Republican Candidates Combined.
Excluding Bill Richardson, John McCain is more qualified than All of the Democratic candidates combined.
Put next to Bill Richardson John McCain would still be more qualified to run this country. Not to mention he would steal many Democratic voters with his common sense approach.
Ron Paul, he is strongly in favor of not interfering in other countries affairs, and that is desperately needed now. Lets get back to a country that our constitution was supposed to be.
Ron Paul.
Commerce and friendship with all nations,
BINDING ALLIANCES WITH NONE!!!!!!
The one who can mend the fence trampled on by our current prez, so best for the job would be Hilliary
Any Democrat,or independent!The Democrats or indedpendents are more willing to talk and negotiate than just start dropping bombs on the wrong country.Plus this country will fold if a Republican is elected for four more years!
Take a look at what has happened during Bush's Republican Presidency. France was strongly Anti-American and now they have elected a strong Pro-American President. Australia has become far more vocal as being Pro-American and this increase in American support was a major election issue that the Prime Minister ran on and contributed to his win. Canada was slighly Anti-American and have elected a strong Pro-American Prime Minister. Afganistan and Iraq were providing and training Terrorists to attack America and are now Pro-American governments. In Afganistan and Iraq the minority that was Anti-American were obviously removed by force though the people were strongly Pro-American and now their governments properly address the Pro-American stance of the people. Pakistan is a very diffilcult situation though parts of Pakistan were strongly Anti-American and some of these areas remain so though the number is far fewer than it was. The government proper allowed Anti-American Terrorist activities and has now used their military to eliminate these elements. The government has become Pro-American and been a tremendous aid to the US. All of the Eastern European countries and former communist countries have become even stronger Pro-American during the Republican Bush Presidency. It's clear that a strong Republican President is best for the US as well as the world. To me it matters a great deal which Republican becomes President though that is insignificant on every level when you compare the difference between the disaster a Democrat President would be in comparison to having a Republican President continue to strengthen America on the world stage. I know the liberals keep pushing the lie that we've lost our credibility in the world and Europe hates us. I don't know what could be shown as a greater fact than the actual elections that show the vast majority of the people in these countries have become increasingly Pro-American during Republican President Bush's term. If you want to read the London Times back when President Clinton was in office it's hilarious what a baffoon they thought that guy was. The US main stream media wouldn't report the vast majority of his scandals though they were so obvious and he was so obviously guilty that even the Liberal London Times printed the facts thinking for sure Clinton would be removed from office well before the was impeached. The world thought he was an idiot playboy. A nice guy that was fun to party with though just a stupid bubba and certainly not a world leader. I don't know why people are trying to claim now that we were respected at that time when the opposite was the truth.
FYI: Clinton didn't goto the House and Senate asking for approval for the Bosnian war. Clinton didn't go to the the UN for approval for the Bosnian war. I thought these were things the liberals wanted?
I think Ron Paul would probably be the best choice. The European left would probably hate his domestic policies (Europe is plagued by socialists who are obstructing needed economic reforms), but they'd definitely be glad that he would get American troops out of Europe and shut down the American Empire.
The European right and center would probably like Ron Paul's domestic policies and would probably eventually like his foreign policy anyways, as they'd be glad that the European left could no longer attack them based on their support for America (which is the only thing the left in Europe has left).
If we elect Ron Paul, he would seek peace and trade with all nations and entangling alliances with none. This policy is the best way to ensure good relationships with all foreign powers and peace on Earth.
i do agree with patrick
Rudy.
More questions & answers:
- As Romney and Giuliani pick at each others heels won't this catapult McCain to front runner status?
- WOMEN: for god sake here is your proof. Hillary is no good for you!?
- Who else....?
- I am SO CONFUSED... everyone is talking about the greatness of RON PAUL, and I agree, but polls show he's last
- Does Barack Obama stand for the pledge?
- If Ron Paul doesn't win the republican nomination ?
- Should Republicans focus on the Special Olympics in 2008?
- Dear members of yahoo answers...I am asking for your advice on voting for the next primary election...?
- Ronald Reagan ran on Abolishing the Department of Education..So why is Ron Paul "kooky" for doing the same?
- What do you think of this Edwards ad threatening Congress on health care?
- Which state has more people (in percentage) who actively vote in elections/ballots?
I'd like to agree with you... but all I can really say is I hope so
I think the notion of bickering endlessly about I'm more conservative than you are is ridiculous, and that there is muc
I think the notion of bickering endlessly about I'm more conservative than you are is ridiculous, and that there is muc
I don't need to read the article. I already know she's scum. Our country will be destroyed if the Hildabeast is elected!
I am to some degree. I was hoping to hear more from Fred about his views. I still don't know where he stands on illegal immigration and social security. Do you know?
14 year olds can't vote and are not polled
First of all I agree with 2008 Matters. Second, yes is mother is white and his father is black but that doesn't make him a Muslim, Christian, or Jewish. Yes, when he was kid raised by a single paren
what do you mean if?? he will not win the nomination.. nor will anyone choose him as a running partner... but yes, to answer your question... you can write him in.. but, i STRONGLY recommend that you
Are you entering? Is there a ranting dumbass category?
Once you have made some sort of list, research the candidates that you have picked further. Don't let a mistake here or there change your opinion, but if you see a pattern of a politician doing what m
Good Lord, how did I miss this question..
*thanks for your support of Paul, but please remember to elaborate on these issues..
First of all.. let's make something clear.. Paul wants to e
*thanks for your support of Paul, but please remember to elaborate on these issues..
First of all.. let's make something clear.. Paul wants to e
Let's look at the SCHIP bill that has been making the rounds in Washington despite the Presidential veto. Next look at the poll numbers for the senators and representatives who voted against the expan
Minnesota had the highest voter turnout in the November 2004 Presidential Election with 76% of its population voting.
To view the stats by state from this election, go here:
To view the stats by state from this election, go here: